Your Email (required)

What is your postcode? (required)

12

12

By submitting this form, I agree to you forwarding the above message, my name, postcode and email address to the London Borough of Richmond upon Thames in response to their public consultation on a Public Spaces Protection Order for the Rosslyn Road area. I understand my data may be retained for monitoring purposes. See our Privacy policy here.

1. Which of these best describes you: (tick all that apply)

I live in the proposed Public Space Protection Order (PSPO) areaI live outside the proposed PSPO areaI am, or was, a client or visitor to Marie Stopes on Wynnstay Grove, Fallowfield.I am, or was, a staff member of Marie Stopes on Wynnstay Grove, Fallowfield.I am a supporter of pro-life activitiesI am a supporter of pro-choice activitiesI own or work in a local business or organisation in the proposed PSPO area (please specify name):

3. Do you agree or disagree with the boundaries of the proposed PSPO area?

AgreeNeither agree or disagreeDisagreeDon't know

4. Why do you disagree with the boundaries of the proposed PSPO area?

5. Which behaviours do you want to give your view on?

Protesting, namely engaging in any act of approval / disapproval or attempted act of approval / disapproval, with respect to issues related to abortion services by any means. This includes but is not limited to graphic, verbal or written means, prayer or counsellingInterfering, or attempting to interfere, whether verbally or physically, with a staff member or service user of the Centre (service user includes any patient or visitor to the centre)Intimidating or harassing, or attempting to intimidate or harass, a staff member or service user of the CentreNo person shall in a public place in the Restricted Area other than in the Designated Zone record or photograph a staff member or service user of the Centre without the explicit consent of that personDisplaying any text or images relating directly or indirectly to the termination of pregnancyDistributing any text or images relating directly or indirectly to the termination of pregnancyPlaying amplified music, voice or audio recordings with respect to the approval or disapproval of abortion services

6. How problematic do you think this behaviour is in the proposed PSPO area?

A major problemA minor problemNot a problemDon't know

7. How often have you personally experienced problems with this behaviour?

OnceNeverDailyWeeklyAnuallyOther

8. Do you agree or disagree that this behaviour should be included in the PSPO?

AgreeDisagree

9. Has this behaviour had a detrimental effect on your quality of life?

YesNo

11. How problematic do you think this behaviour is in the proposed PSPO area?

A major problemA minor problemNot a problemDon't know

12. How often have you personally experienced problems with this behaviour?

OnceMore than onceMore than 5 timesNeverDailyWeeklyAnuallyOther

13. Do you agree or disagree that this behaviour should be included in the PSPO?

AgreeDisagree

14. Has this behaviour had a detrimental effect on your quality of life?

YesNo

16. How problematic do you think this behaviour is in the proposed PSPO area?

A major problemA minor problemNot a problemDon't know

17. How often have you personally experienced problems with this behaviour?

OnceMore than onceMore than 5 timesNeverDailyWeeklyAnuallyOther

18. Do you agree or disagree that this behaviour should be included in the PSPO?

AgreeDisagree

19. Has this behaviour had a detrimental effect on your quality of life?

YesNo

21. How problematic do you think this behaviour is in the proposed PSPO area?

A major problemA minor problemNot a problemDon't know

22. How often have you personally experienced problems with this behaviour?

OnceMore than onceMore than 5 timesNeverDailyWeeklyAnuallyOther

23. Do you agree or disagree that this behaviour should be included in the PSPO?

AgreeDisagree

24. Has this behaviour had a detrimental effect on your quality of life?

YesNo

26. How problematic do you think this behaviour is in the proposed PSPO area?

A major problemA minor problemNot a problemDon't know

27. How often have you personally experienced problems with this behaviour?

OnceMore than onceMore than 5 timesNeverDailyWeeklyAnuallyOther

28. Do you agree or disagree that this behaviour should be included in the PSPO?

AgreeDisagree

29. Has this behaviour had a detrimental effect on your quality of life?

YesNo

31. How problematic do you think this behaviour is in the proposed PSPO area?

A major problemA minor problemNot a problemDon't know

32. How often have you personally experienced problems with this behaviour?

OnceMore than onceMore than 5 timesNeverDailyWeeklyAnuallyOther

33. Do you agree or disagree that this behaviour should be included in the PSPO?

AgreeDisagree

34. Has this behaviour had a detrimental effect on your quality of life?

YesNo

36. How problematic do you think this behaviour is in the proposed PSPO area?

A major problemA minor problemNot a problemDon't know

37. How often have you personally experienced problems with this behaviour?

OnceMore than onceMore than 5 timesNeverDailyWeeklyAnuallyOther

38. Do you agree or disagree that this behaviour should be included in the PSPO?

AgreeDisagree

39. Has this behaviour had a detrimental effect on your quality of life?

YesNo

41. If you have any further comments on either of these proposals please state here:

I oppose the use of a PSPO to restrict any of the behaviours in the proposed PSPO because they are designed to be used as a tool of last resort and the proposal would prevent women receiving help at the gate as they need it. Other, less restrictive means are available including court orders that would not impinge on the fundamental human rights of locals and visitors. Existing laws protect sufficiently and require a reasonable burden of proof.

42. Do you agree or disagree with this proposal?

A person who an Authorised Person or Constable reasonably suspects of breaching any of the prohibitions or requirements in this Order shall, upon valid request of an Authorised Person or Constable, leave the PSPO area within a reasonable time as specified in writing by that Authorised Person and not return within 24 hours.

A requirement under this Article is not valid if the Authorised Person or Constable is asked by the person subject to the requirement to show evidence of their authorisation and they fail to do so.

Strongly AgreeAgreeNeither agree or disagreeDisagreeStrongly DisagreeDon't know

43. Do you agree or disagree with this proposal?

A person who an Authorised Person or Constable reasonably suspects of breaching any of the prohibitions or requirements in this Order shall, upon request of that Authorised Person, provide their name, address and date of birth to that Authorised Person.

A requirement under this Article is not valid if the Authorised Person is asked by the person subject to the requirement to show evidence of their authorisation and they fail to do so.

Strongly AgreeAgreeNeither agree or disagreeDisagreeStrongly DisagreeDon't know

44. If you have any further comments on either of these proposals please state here:

I disagree with the use of these powers in principle as a PSPO is unnecessarily restrive of fundamental rights. An ‘authorised person’ does not need to be a police officer which could lead to private security firms or council officers using this broad power at their own discretion. The council has no right to the personal details outlined unless a crime has been committed.

45. Do you agree or disagree with having a designated zone?

AgreeDisagree

49. Which behaviours do you want to give your view on?

No more than four persons may be present in the Designated Zone at any one timeNo individual poster, text or image, singularly or collectively greater than one sheet of A3 paper may be displayed within the Designated ZoneA person within the Designated Zone must not shout any message or words relating to the approval / disapproval of issues related to abortion servicesA person within the Designated Zone must not play or use amplified music, voice or audio recordings with respect to the approval or disapproval of abortion servicesA person who an Authorised Person or Constable reasonably suspects of breaching any of the prohibitions or requirements in the designated zone shall, upon valid request of an Authorised Person or Constable, leave the PSPO area within a reasonable time as specified in writing by that Authorised Person or Constable and not return within 24 hours. A requirement under this Article is not valid if the Authorised Person or Constable is asked by the person subject to the requirement to show evidence of their authorisation and they fail to do soA person who an Authorised Person or Constable reasonably suspects of breaching any of the prohibitions or requirements in the designated zone shall, upon request of that Authorised Person or Constable, provide their name, address and date of birth to that Authorised Person or Constable. A requirement under this Article is not valid if the Authorised Person or Constable is asked by the person subject to the requirement to show evidence of their authorisation and they fail to do so

50. If you have any further comments on either of these proposals please state here:

I disagree in principle with the designated zone because I disagree in principle with the PSPO. The designated zone undermines the reasoning given for the PSPO in the first place as it would permit behaviours that proponents of the PSPO claim to be inherently harassing etc.

51: Please provide any further comments regarding the proposals including any suggestions you may have about an alternative approach:

The proposals unnecessarily restrict fundamental human rights to speech, expression, religious practice and the rights of women to receive help and information on the street. A PSPO is meant to be a tool of last resort. There is no evidence that the council has attempted to use any other, less restrictive means to resolve the perceived problem, such as injunctions and court orders. It is clear from the process so far that a PSPO is a preconceived result.

52. What is your gender?

FemaleMalePrefer not to sayOther

53. Do you identify with the gender you were assigned at birth? (e.g. male or female)

YesNoPrefer not to say

54. What is your age?

Under 1616 - 25 years26 - 39 years40 - 49 years50 - 64 years65 - 74 years75+ yearsprefer not to say

55. I describe my ethnic origin as:

White British/English/Northern Irish/Scottish/WelshWhite IrishWhite Gypsy or Irish TravellerOther MixedMixed White and Black CaribbeanMixed White and Black AfricanMixed White and AsianOther MixedIndianPakistaniBengladeshiChineseKashmiriOther AsianCaribbeanAfricanSomaliOther BlackPrefer not to sayOther ethnic group (please specify)

56. Do you consider yourself to be a disabled person?

YesNoPrefer not to say

57. Do you identify with any religion or belief?

YesNo